How Can We Get Teachers to Be Less Cautious and More Confident Teaching Evolution?

It is shameful that in the United States—in the year 2011—teachers should feel intimidated when presenting well-established science. Yet a recent article in the journal Science revealed that up to 60 percent of teachers are “cautious” when it comes to teaching one of the most well-established and widely accepted theories in all of science: evolution. They skip lessons on evolution, downplay its importance, and avoid the subject, to the detriment of their students’ educations and the scientific literacy of this country.

There are several things we can do to improve this situation.

First, attacks on evolution in the media need to be countered with real science. Evolution comes under assault every day—in letters to the editor in local papers, in comments on news stories, on blog posts. Last week, a creationist group in New Mexico even bought a full-page newspaper ad to promote an anti-evolution bill. This pervasive anti-science climate is part of the reason why teachers feel cautious about teaching the solid science of evolution. Supporters of the integrity of science education need to mount a response—writing letters and sending emails in defense of the teaching of evolution.

Pro-science parents need to make it clear to teachers and school administrators that they expect evolution to be taught. Most parents simply assume that science is being taught in the science classroom, but the reality is that anti-evolution forces are pervasive, vocal, and influential. Teachers who present evolution forthrightly and their administrators are all too likely to hear an earful from parents opposed to evolution. They need to start hearing from pro-science parents—parents who will stand with them in such confrontations over evolution.

Finally, in-service teachers need the tools to teach evolution effectively. Schools are underfunded as it is, of course, with children often learning science from outdated books in classrooms lacking materials for hands-on learning. But with evolution under constant attack, it’s especially important to ensure that teachers with the courage to teach it properly will have the resources to do so. Talk to your children’s science teachers and school librarians about donating books, DVDs, and instructional materials about evolution and related topics to your school’s library and classrooms.

In the long run, more than these measures will have to be taken; the recent Science article calls for pre-service teachers to learn more about evolution in their own education, to enable them to teach it with more confidence even in the face of local opposition. But for now, there are plenty of opportunities to work to improve evolution education piecemeal. Teacher by teacher, school by school, district by district, we can take steps to help transform this “cautious 60 percent” of teachers into a strong majority teaching the best science possible.

Steven Newton is the programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education.

  • Share/Bookmark

Category: Q&A

Tagged:

2 Responses

  1. Oran says:

    I took away something a little different. The percentage of teachers actively _promoting_ creationism or evolution was relatively small, but way too many were teaching it poorly. As far as I’m concerned, that’s as big of a problem as the creationist zealots.

    You don’t need to constantly offend a creationist to teach them biology properly. I’ve heard of plenty of cases where creationist children ended up believing in evolution as adults because they wanted to be doctors or biologists and the evidence eventually brought them along. First, you just need to sell it the right way. Don’t hard sell it. Just say: “If you want to understand modern biology, you need to understand this framework — if you don’t believe it’s literally true, that’s fine, but it’s the best _material_ description of the data, and science only deals in the material, not the supernatural” and “If you want to challenge these ideas in the arena of science, you have to understand them, first, but you don’t have to believe them to understand them. All scientific knowledge is tentative, not absolute truth, but you have to have a basic understanding of the current knowledge in order to take the next step.” And so on.

    … But then, you need to teach the science of it WELL!

  2. Paul Richard Strange, Sr. says:

    Not all creationists have a problem with the theory of evolution, as you know. Some oppose the philosophy dominant among too many college science departments which pretty much seeks to destroy any scientist, no matter how well her or his achievements, if such a person questions, NOT the science of evolution, but the dominant philosophy of those who immediately excuse Richard Dawkins, while having a kneejerk reaction to even the thought that some kind of explanation for design and order can be a rational scientific pursuit.

    You should know of a controversial book which challenges young earth creationism on the grounds of the Bible. It is written by Timothy P. Martin and Dr. Jeffrey Vaughn. It’s title is “Beyond Creation Science: New Covenant Creation from Genesis to Revelation”.

    This book deserves to be a classic. Anyone who is tolerant of religious study, would find a surprisingly unique book which, if widely read among Christian pastors, would lead to the freedom of science teachers to boldly teach everything which is held by scientists across the philosophical spectrum to be well-established truth. Evolution will cease to be a dirty word when it’s most prominent spokespersons are not Dawkinites, but the many others on many websites who carefully explain evolution without deliberately advancing a philosophical agenda!

    PAUL RICHARD STRANGE SR
    119 MARVIN GARDENS
    dadprs@hotmail.com
    WAXAHACHIE TEXAS 75165

Leave a Reply