The Future of Neurotheology

From Andrew Newberg, director of research at the Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals:

In my latest book, Principles of Neurotheology, I try to espouse a set of principles that might help guide the neurological study of religious and spiritual experiences moving forward. The goal is to address the philosophical, theological, and scientific issues related to this field. The question is, what will the future of neurotheology look like? What might neurotheology accomplish in the next five, 10, or even 50 years?

Neurotheology is still very early in its development. Truly combining neuroscience with religious and spiritual phenomena was only possible with the advent of modern brain imaging techniques. Before the development of these techniques, the rudiments of neurotheology were developed based primarily on animal models and speculation. Today, we have begun to uncover substantial information regarding the relationship between the human brain and religious and spiritual practices and experiences

In the next five years, neurotheology will likely continue to advance our understanding of how the brain is associated with religious and spiritual phenomena. Most likely, the brain imaging studies that have become an important aspect of neurotheology will continue to expand. There are many types of practices and experiences that remain to be evaluated using brain imaging techniques. Traditions might be compared, as well as the wide variety of practices within each tradition. Imaging studies, along with other clinical studies, will help us better understand not only what happens in the brain at the time of a particular practice, such as meditation or prayer, but also how such practices affect us over time. Already, we understand that practices like meditation and prayer can lower anxiety and depression, and even help the brain remember better. Such improvements are associated with long-term changes in the brain’s function. Thus, religion, spirituality, and God all can change your brain.

In addition to what we know about general brain function, future studies in the next five to 10 years will hopefully evaluate how a variety of neurotransmitter systems relate to religious and spiritual phenomena. Several early studies suggest that both dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are associated with practices like meditation. This is interesting since dopamine is associated with the reward system, movement, and memory. GABA is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, perhaps related to blissful experiences, that helps shut the mind down. But other neurotransmitters may be involved in complex interactions during religious and spiritual practices.

It may be that in the next 10 years, we can begin working toward what might be called a “religionome.” In this context, a religionome would be an attempt at cataloguing every different type of religious and spiritual practice and experience across all people, cultures, and traditions. This would integrate both subjective experiences, doctrinal and theological concepts, health-related components, and physiology in an overall evaluation of how human beings are religious and spiritual. This would also require an understanding of the differences between those who are religious or spiritual and those who are atheist or agnostic. In addition, neurotheology must help us try to understand when religious and spiritual beliefs turn negative, leading to hatred, violence, and terrorism.

In the far future, neurotheology could open up some fascinating possibilities. Since practices like meditation result in altered states of consciousness, neurotheology may help us understand the nature of consciousness and how it relates to the material world. Perhaps we might better understand how our consciousness affects ourselves and the world around us. Neurotheology may help us fully realize our religious or spiritual potential, finding the most effective ways of optimizing this part of ourselves and hopefully contributing to a more compassionate and understanding period of human existence. And it has always been my hope that a neurotheological approach might yield answers to some of the greatest questions in human history: Why are we here? Why is there something rather than nothing? What is the true nature of reality?

While these questions may seem impossible to address, I would argue that the best attempt requires an approach that integrates the best we can derive from science and the best we can derive from religious, spiritual, and philosophical pursuits. Will neurotheology lead humanity toward a new enlightenment? Only time will tell.

Category: Expert Opinion


6 Responses

  1. mihaela says:


    I’m write You from Bosnia, Sarajevo. I have few hard questions:

    1. Can temporal lobe epilepsy be a something like “door” for achieve higher level of consciousness, meditations, creativity and other stuff (of course, with taking antiepileptic drugs)?

    2. How antiepileptic drugs working when we speaking about creativity, perceptions and other?

    3. Can we say that epilepsy may be something like gift?

    4. Is there any chance that people with epilepsy use more % brain then “ordinary” people?

  2. Alisha says:

    I have just finished a bsc in psychology and have always been fascinated with how the mind and religion interact. Recently I have begun to look into the neuroscience behind religous and spiritual experiences. I live in Canada and was hoping on being able to attend a university here in order to obtain my masters degree. However, I am finding it extremely difficult to find any universities doing research in this area here. Does anyone know where someone can find out which universities are doing research into religion and psychology and neuroscience?

  3. Mariam F. Maharaj says:

    After attending a seminar presenting Andrew Newberg as the keynote speaker, the relationship between neuroscience and religion is very important to decipher the connection of emotion in religion that span over many disciplines.

    I, being a individual exposed to the Islamic and Christian community it;s safe to say that these religions and others have a common neurological response. In most prayer and meditation, the key is to calm the mind, inhibit and detach one’s self form the physical world. Depending on your exposure and understanding people develop a preference to what religion they chose. Another point is that religion can be a fabrication of the mind because we know scientifically the mind is consistently firing neuron at rapid rates and its near impossible to stop the mind, unless you are dead.

    Religion justifies and calm the mind, explains the act of why human and why we behave the way we do. Looking at it more scientifically we know that we are advanced species who developed an additional pathway to how we perceive the world, creating the conscious experience that separates us from the animals. At the end of the day look to the brain explains every detail and aspect to out being.

    Combining religion and neuroscience is genius. A very important statement Newberg said(not word for word but you get the idea): we have to question our beliefs and reevaluate them because values do change over time. Question your very being, your essence, and the reasons why you are doing what you are doing.. From those questions we learns to expand our mind and look back at the aspects we lack.

    -Mariam F. Maharaj, Richard Stockton College of N.J

  4. Hayley says:

    I have been waiting for a very long time to take a degree in something I really would love to learn more about and I researched it called, “Neurotheology” … I would like to know where can I take this course, so far I came across University of Florida; however I was hoping to take it in Alberta, CANADA. Or, is there pre requisite I can take that will lead me into “neurotheology”? Someone please I can really use the help in finding out where I can learn and study more about this interesting subject. of the divine and the brain.

  5. Don Ayre says:

    I was in private practice as a family and child therapist and only recently stumbled onto neurotheology having self-published a book – Toward a More Loving and Caring World – based on my practice. I taught family and child therapy at the School of Social Work at the University of Manitoba in the late 60’s but the School was Freudian to gain scientific credibility and resisted Jungian psychology; also the writings of Eric Fromm. To me, psychology and spirituality go hand in hand and I am pleased to see a science of neurotheology being developed. Hopefully, it will gain acceptance in our universities and in the knowledge base of our society in general.

  6. Shahriar Gharibzadeh says:

    Thank you very much for this beautiful writing.
    I think we really need to find answers to your last questions as “what is the true nature of reality”. Having answers to these questions, I think, can change our way of living. We may have more successful life.

Leave a Reply